전세계 백신순위 테스트 결과 AV-Test (2008년 9월 평가자료)

독일의 AV-TEST.ORG 에서 주관하는 백신 제품 테스트 2008년 9월 결과가 발표되었습니다.

신빙성없는 개인 테스트 결과가 아니라 비영리기관의 테스트 결과라서 어느정도 참고가 될 것입니다.

이번 테스트 환경의 운영체제(OS)는 Windows XP SP3이며 자세한 내용은
다음 링크를 참고하시기 바랍니다.

 

출처 : http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2008/09_02

 

AV-Test release latest results

Major test of suite products completed

Independent testing body AV-Test.org has released the results of a major comparative of suite products, with many vendors' 2009 editions included in the results. The test covers a range of metrics, including detection rates over various types of malware including adware and spyware, false positive rates, scanning speed, proactive detection, and response times to outbreaks.

In terms of pure detection rates in on-demand scanning, a beta version of GDATA's AVK 2009 topped the charts for both 'malware' (measured against 1,164,662 samples) and 'ad- and spyware' (94,291 samples), with Avira's Premium Security Suite 2008 a close runner-up in the former category and F-Secure 2009 placing second in the latter. Secure Computing's Webwasher gateway product, based on the Avira engine with some in-house heuristics, came third in both categories.

Other areas analysed were scored on a five-point scale from very good to very poor. 'Proactive' protection included scanning of files discovered after the freezing of products, and executing unrecognised malware to test behavioural protection. Products rating 'good' or better in every category include Avira's premium suite (the popular free version has less complete spyware detection), AVK 2009, F-Secure's 2009 suite, Symantec's Norton I.S. 2009 (still in beta) and Sophos's Security Suite 2.5. All products taking part in the test managed to achieve a 'good' or better in at least one category.

The test also included keeping a record of the number of updates released over a four-week period. Of course, these numbers on their own cannot be used to measure the quality of the products involved, but were recorded out of interest. The most interesting data to emerge from this measurement was that the 2009 version of Norton topped the table with an impressive 6,202 incremental micro-updates, issued several times per hour, while Kaspersky came a distant second with a mere 696. Half of the 34 products tested had fewer than 100, including those from McAfee (21) and Trend Micro (30).

A summary of the major areas tested is printed below; hover over the product names to see full version information.

Product	malware on demand	adware / spyware on demand	false positives	scan speed	proactive detection	response times	malware on demand	adware / spyware on demand
AntiVir (Avira)	++	++ (4)	+	++	+	++	99.8%	99.0%
Avast! (Alwil)	++	++	+	+	o	o	99.3%	98.3%
AVG	+	- (4)	+	+	o	o	95.8%	87.0%
AVK 2008 (G Data) (1)	++	++	o	-	+	++	99.2%	99.1%
AVK 2009 (G Data) (2)	++	++	+	+	++	++	99.8%	99.8%
BitDefender 2008	+	-	+	-	++	+	97.7%	87.8%
BitDefender 2009	+	-	+	o	++	+	97.6%	88.0%
CA-AV (VET)	--	--	++	o	-	--	65.5%	68.0%
ClamAV	-	o	-	--	-	++	88.5%	92.8%
Dr Web	--	-	o	o	+	o	84.9%	89.6%
eScan	+	+	o	-	+	++	97.8%	97.4%
Fortinet-GW	o	--	o	+	++	+	92.6%	81.9%
F-Prot (Frisk)	o	o	+	+	o	o	94.8%	92.6%
F-Secure 2008	++	++	+	o	++	+	98.2%	98.4%
F-Secure 2009	++	++	+	+	++	++	99.2%	99.6%
Ikarus	++	++	o	+	+	+	99.5%	98.6%
K7 Computing	o	o	o	++	-	o	92.1%	94.0%
Kaspersky	++	++	o	o	+	++	98.4%	98.3%
McAfee	o	o	++	o	+	-	93.6%	94.5%
Microsoft	+	+	++	o	-	-	97.7%	97.1%
Nod32 (Eset)	o	o	++	++	++	+	94.4%	94.7%
Norman	+	+	+	o	+	o	96.3%	95.8%
Norton 2008 (Symantec)	+	o	++	+	+	o	97.8%	94.6%
Norton 2009 (Symantec)	++	+	++	++	+	++	98.7%	95.4%
Panda 2008	-	o	+	+	++	o	86.4%	93.4%
Panda 2009	o	+	+	+	++	+	91.8%	95.6%
Rising	--	--	+	o	o	o	83.4%	77.5%
Sophos	+	+	+	+	++	+	97.5%	95.0%
Trend Micro	o	-	+	+	o	+	91.3%	88.5%
TrustPort	++	++	-	--	++	++	99.5%	98.4%
VBA32	o	-	o	o	+	o	90.5%	85.2%
VirusBuster	-	-	+	+	o	o	89.0%	85.8%
WebWasher-GW (3)	++	++	o	++	++	++	99.7%	99.2%
ZoneAlarm	+	+	o	o	+	++	97.8%	97.7%
Index	malware on demand	adware / spyware on demand	false positives	scan speed	proactive detection	response times	malware on demand	adware / spyware on demand
++	>98%	>98%	no FP			< 2 h
+	>95%	>95%	1-2 FP			2 - 4 h
o	>90%	>90%	3-4 FP			4 - 6 h
-	>85%	>85%	5-6 FP			6 - 8 h
--	<85%	<85%	> 6 FP			> 8 h

Notes
(1) AVK 2008 uses the Avast and Kaspersky scan engines
(2) AVK 2009 uses the Avast and BitDefender scan engines
(3) WebWasher uses the Avira engine and a self-developed heuristic engine
(4) the free (personal) edition does not include ad- and spyware detection, so the results would be --

02 September 2008

 

[주의 사항]

이번 테스트 결과 nod32, antivir 등이 전반적으로 좋은 평가를 받은 것 같습니다.
이런 테스트 결과를 맹신할 필요는 없습니다.
하루에도 수천개씩 악성코드가 등장하는데 한번의 테스트 결과가
전체의 성능이나 기능을 모두 설명하지 못 합니다.
단순히 진단을 잘한다고 해서 진단 속도나 메모리 점유율, 오진율 등
다른 기능이 못 미칠 수도 있습니다.